That is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.

That is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.

So you want to answer the Call for Papers? It provides recommendations for the information and presentation for the abstract, as well as samples of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Typically, an abstract describes this issue you may like to present during the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the literature that is historical. Most commonly it is restricted to 250-500 words. The phrase limit could be challenging: some graduate students try not to fret over the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract at the eleventh hour, which often hurts their chances of being accepted; other students you will need to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which are often equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most often invited to provide their research. For those who are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the guidelines that are basic and prevent common pitfalls and you’ll greatly boost your abstract.

Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, as well as perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, how exactly to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or not. Be sure that you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it really is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things and never look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make sure that you orient your abstract topic to address any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.

Be Concise

With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and look closely at excessive phrasing that is prepositional.

Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A abstract that is good address the next questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It ought to be original. What exactly is your evidence? State forthrightly you are using source material that is primary. So how exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What’s happening in neuro-scientific study and just how does your paper play a role in it? How does it matter? We realize the topic is important to you personally, why should it is important to the abstract selection committee?

You should be as specific as you can, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you ought to say and nothing more.

Keep your audience in your mind. How background that is much give on a topic is determined by the conference. Could be the conference an over-all humanities conference, a general graduate student history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should really be suitable for the specificity for the conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad need certainly to give and vice versa.

Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can be the best time to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear and it also should read smoothly. If you are tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.

Your language should always be professional and your style should adhere to academic standards. Contractions might be appealing due to the expressed word limits, nonetheless they should be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the name that is author’s title of work (in a choice of italics or quotation marks) within the text as opposed to use footnotes or in-text citations.

Misusing Questions

While one question, if really good, might be posed in your abstract, you ought to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). That you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you are posing an obvious rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there if you do pose a question or two, make sure. Way too many questions takes up a lot of space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you are not anticipated to have already written your conference paper, you are anticipated to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Illustrate that you have done so.

Language that helps you be as specific as you possibly can in presenting your argument is fantastic but don’t get the readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll be reading a lot of abstracts and won’t would you like to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.

When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize these are generally doing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on the argument. Consider it a few more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Make certain each sentence is exclusive and therefore it contributes to the flow of one’s abstract.

The abstract committee does not want to be reminded regarding the grand sweep of history to be able to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.

The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with the samples below were subsequently selected for publication when you look at the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.